thank you for all dear times.
i will never read you again. Assange should have been named. He change the way the world is. He gave freedom of information to the unknown person like me. I hope there are no more Zuckerbergs and more Assanges in our world. it would really help.

OMG you guys! That evil media is totally out to stamp out the light of peace and hope and non-douchiness that is Julian “The Hooligan” Assange! We, being totally honest, totally truthful, totally informed citizens, should band together to fight this radical infringement on our oh-so-fragile ideas of right and wrong! We should strike back at the oppressive establishment of media and advertising (which, incidentally, also funds this website we’re commenting on right now), and raise our collective voices high!……by tweeting about it for a few hours until we forget about it and go back to looking at porn…I mean, looking at WikiPorn….I mean, WikiLeaks….I jerk off to WikiLeaks.

where is his nose

I expected this from Time Magazine and in fact all media. They are controlled by “support the agenda of the rich and powerful” conservatives. When people look back on this in the future, it is Julian Assange that will be remembered. Was Daniel Ellsberg ever Time’s man of the year? Daniel Ellsberg is Assange and everything Assange isn’t, and today we refer to him all the time when anyone discusses Wikileaks. Because of Ellsberg, we weren’t surprised about what was contained in Wikileaks. Ellsberg is a hero for my generation of truth seekers, as Assange should be for the truth seeking youth of today.

he looks like a na’vi

dear god, I hate facebook. I refuse to join the sheep!

dumb. an overwhelming majority of people dont use facebook, a bigger majority dont know who zuckerberg is, and ill bet a majority dont even know what facebook even is.

Well it’s obvious Time has no balls.

So a horse walks into a bar…

Why, why, WHY wasn’t this Assange?

He looks like shit all the time.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH HIS FAAACE

Not to mention that that is quite possibly one of the single most unflattering pictures ever.

I was rooting for Gaga. Dammit.

Guess they decided not to do it by vote this year.

Zuckerberg should be the person of 2009. The person of 2010 should really be David Fincher (or arguably Aaron Sorkin) for pretty much making Mark Zuckerberg more relevant.

Great idea! for 2009. I guess there is a certain symmetry for a magazine devoted to publishing week-old news analysis.

Time´s soon to be forgotten person. Can you remember last year´s?