A federal appeals court on Thursday put the trial court decision striking down New York City’s implementation of its stop-and-frisk policy as unconstitutional on hold while it considers the city’s appeal of that decision.
A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals also removed the trial court judge from the case, “conclud[ing] that the District Judge ran afoul of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges,” and ordering that a new judge be assigned to the case.
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, the appeals court held, violated the rule mandating that “[a] judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities.” The “appearance of impropriety,” the court held was created, in part, because of “a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of the District Court.”
The city’s appeal, however, is not due to the court until Jan. 24, 2014, at which point a new mayor will have taken the place of Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Bill de Blasio has criticized the city’s enforcement of the policy.
The plaintiffs challenging the policy have their response due by Feb. 28, 2014, according to Thursday’s order, with the city’s reply due by March 14, 2014 and oral argument heard after that.
- The Temple of Bel, an important ancient structure in the ISIS-held Syrian city of Palmyra, has been destroyed, the United Nations says. ›
- A white supremacist has been found guilty of capital murder in the shooting deaths of three people at two Jewish facilities in Kansas last year. ›
- The U.S. Supreme Court says a Kentucky county must issue marriage licenses while its clerk appeals a ruling in a lawsuit from three same-sex couples against her "no marriage licenses" policy. ›