Transporter 3’s “Valentina” Sucks So Good
Google “irritating” and the name of Transporter 3 ingenue “Natalya Rudakova” and you’ll find that critics aren’t really taking to her. As usual the critics are dead wrong. Rudakova took Transporter 3 to soaring new Transporter heights with her “can you believe the movie director found her on the street!?!!”-style acting skillz, thick accent, terrible recurring dialogue about food she craves, and what felt like an 80-minute seduction scene.
HOT ON
Facebook Conversations
6 Responses So Far
-
Jeff P 4 years ago -
-
Chelsea Peretti 4 years ago
Here:
1. Poor acting, annoying accent, incoherent 2.
inexperienced, irritating, painful acting debut 3.
irritatingly played by newcomer 4.
what may be the year’s most irritating performance 5.
absolutely horrible, almost unbearable in fact…you’ll probably want to kill Valentina’s character yourself before the movie is done. I would give the film a few more stars if only Martin had delivered a solid backhand at least once. Etc. I stand by my stance that this is a captivating performance and suggest you go see it. -
-
-
Adam Hyland 4 years agoTom: picture of hot chick = front page. that’s SCIENCE, at least on the internets.
-
-
Chelsea Peretti 4 years ago
Hi Tom Ottoman! I was just figuring out how posting here works. I meant to put various links internal to the post. I blew it. I hope you can forgive me and heartfelt apologies go out to the entire BF community. There are a lot of links referring to Rudakova’s performance and I was fully prepared to do a thorough post. Next time I will do better. Sorry internet!
-
-
Tom Ottoman 4 years agoSo, even though there is no ‘internet chatter’ about this girl, and the original post and sole comment come from the same woman, this is “buzz” somehow. Ok.
-
![[link]](http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/images/public/icons/external-link2.png){kind=icon}
Special Reactions
Your Reaction?
React with an animated GIF!
READY. SET. REACT!
GET STARTED