she looked better before

How did that photographer ever get a job?! Most of what was airbrushed was making up for awful lighting on the part of the photographer.

I fuck both versions.

Anyone else think the untouched one is actually more attractive?!

shame they removed the camel toe

Her photoshopped legs look bizarre. Kind of like freaky Barbie legs.

Cameltoe and Bruises aside…I prefer the unretouched images…The one from the back is so scary retouched! Yuck…too too fake skinny.

She doesn't look bad unretouched, actually.

I think she looks great without the photoshop, although i do agree that the removal of the buises and camel toe was smart.

fake bitch

At least she's among the few that admit to getting photoshopped. The majority of celebs wouldn't own up to it. I think they could have just got rid of the bruises and camel toe and that ad would have been just fine.

Maybe the ad agency can photoshop some bacon, jack cheese and sauce between these two Britneys! Nom NOm!

Bruises and Cameltoe aside, she actually looks pretty good untouched.

They took a half inch off of everything on her.

She looks great/legendary.

Hey! They removed the porkchop from her mouth in both pictures!

They also erased the camel toe. Thank god.