Q: Who would you be if you defined yourself strictly according to what you ARE rather than strictly according to what you are NOT? A: Honestly, you don't know, and that's why you've appointed yourself the conservative political respondent of a website that has no bearing on anyfuckingthing. You're taking the easiest path possible—which is your choice of course—yet your profile description reveals that you remain serious about your crusade despite that fact. One can't help but wonder why, though only you know the true answer to that question.

Yeah! Sarah Palin is 'freaking hot,' so let's put her in control of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world!

Beauty comes from within and all these women are rotten to the core.

Being hot is a prerequisite for conservative men to pay attention to women. This is not something to be proud of.

I would drop kick Michelle Malkin down the stairs, to the curb, and out of town before I'd let her in my house, much less my bed. She wouldn't be eating crackers either, she IS crackers! Nuts is probably a better analogy.

You and I have vastly different definitions of “freaking hot”.

LOL… at you.