Whatever we may think of Sophie Anderton and most of us will accept that the woman has been stupid.
It doesn't alter the fact that she was deceived by a man wanting drugs and sex and he betrayed the hooker by exposing her to the media.
If this story of the Fake Sheikh is not admissible as evidence in a criminal court of law, because the evidence was obtained illegally through entrapment.
Then on this same standard applied Sophie should have a good legal claim in a civil court for breach of trust and be entitled to damages ?  I would like to hear reasoned comments on this point please as I have surfed the net for answers to no avail so far.  My own view is that she would win if tested in court -I would love to represent her.