<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>

<channel>
<title>BuzzFeed  - Bernard Yenelouis</title>
<link>http://buzzfeed.com/bjy921</link>
<description>BuzzFeed, Find Your New Favorite Thing</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 BuzzFeed, Inc.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:45:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<managingEditor>editor@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>info@buzzfeed.com (http://www.buzzfeed.com/about)</webMaster>
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.com/bjy921.xml" rel="self" />
<atom:link href="http://buzzfeed.superfeedr.com/" rel="hub" />

<item>
<title>The Arbus image dates from a time (1960s) in which the unheroic subject, looking wan, perhaps cluele</title>
<link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/bjy921/the-arbus-image-dates-from-a-time-1960s-in-which-bi4-1nd</link>
<description><![CDATA[




		



      
    <p>The Arbus image dates from a time (1960s) in which the unheroic subject, looking wan, perhaps clueless, fortified with external trappings of patriotism like scaffolding, could be read easily as a kind of ironic notation by the photographer regarding the subject at hand - the dream of the flag (&amp; rally) apparent along with the immediate sad reality of its abject participant. Arbus was not a documentary photographer in the professional sense of the term, but her photographs are full of information. I would also state that the image, while with very distinct precedents in composition (August Sander) and subject (Weegee, Lisette Model), is still quite fresh and quite cheeky, unburdened by its &#8220;genealogy&#8221; - in contradistinction to the studied, deliberate professionalized photography (both art &amp; journalistic) of our time. Given how we all now so routinely perform for the camera, both real &amp; imaginary. these days, there&#39;s an &#8220;emptiness&#8221; in Arbus&#39; image which while it could be perceived as a form of morbidity, can be appreciated for its lack of mediatized &#8220;noise.&#8221;</p>
    <p><img src="http://s.buzzfeed.com//static/imagebuzz/web02/2008/10/16/17/31bb49c97edf20a744a7cabea56250c9.jpg" width="" height="" alt="" />		</p>
  








]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzfeed.com/bjy921/the-arbus-image-dates-from-a-time-1960s-in-which-bi4-1nd</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:24:54 -0400</pubDate>
<media:content height="320" isDefault="true" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/web02/2008/10/16/17/31bb49c97edf20a744a7cabea56250c9.jpg" width="317">
  <media:description type="html">The Arbus image dates from a time (1960s) in which the unheroic subject, looking wan, perhaps clueless, fortified with external trappings of patriotism like scaffolding, could be read easily as a kind of ironic notation by the photographer regarding the subject at hand - the dream of the flag (&#x26;amp; rally) apparent along with the immediate sad reality of its abject participant. Arbus was not a documentary photographer in the professional sense of the term, but her photographs are full of information. I would also state that the image, while with very distinct precedents in composition (August Sander) and subject (Weegee, Lisette Model), is still quite fresh and quite cheeky, unburdened by its &#x22;genealogy&#x22; - in contradistinction to the studied, deliberate professionalized photography (both art &#x26;amp; journalistic) of our time. Given how we all now so routinely perform for the camera, both real &#x26;amp; imaginary. these days, there&#x26;#39;s an &#x22;emptiness&#x22; in Arbus&#x26;#39; image which while it could be perceived as a form of morbidity, can be appreciated for its lack of mediatized &#x22;noise.&#x22;</media:description>
  <media:credit role="user" scheme="http://www.buzzfeed.com">bjy921</media:credit>
  <media:rating scheme="urn:simple">adult</media:rating>
  <media:thumbnail height="83" url="http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/web02/2008/10/16/18/65ac8a2af7cd8a867ed1eb6a99b05794.jpg" width="125" />
</media:content>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
