Homer, I don’t know where to begin to tell you what’s wrong with this one.
1.) As has been stated previously, if you were genuinely surprised that Obama won, you were not paying attention.
2.) Surprisingly on this one, I agree with you. Regan was a shitty president. Obama so far has been decent.
3.) Hi, kettle? Yeah, it’s Monica. You’re black.
4.) Actually, http://www.uvm.edu/~vlrs/doc/min_wage.htm
5.) Actually, http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jan/09/worst-effects-austerity-disability-charity
6.) And actually, http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/
7.) What do you mean by this exactly? Is this a sever case of the Rove’s? Because you know that Obama was elected and sworn in as president twice already, right? Fetch has happened.
8.)This could explain how you would be unaware that Obama was going to win the election. You openly admit that you refuse to follow political events, but still want us to take this “article” seriously?
9.) Defriend them. It’ll best for the both of you.
10.) See #2.
11 and 12.) So you feel like the kickass captain of a star ship, but you want to feel like a guy who play make believe in his underpants? Dude, Picard > The Miz.
13.) Like what? Do you mean the initial stimulus bill that conservatives have been trying to distance themselves from since it was implemented?
12.)Arguing that we shouldn’t abandon our elderly, poor, sick and handicapped is not the same as pretending that we don’t have a spending problem. Disagreeing about what needs to be cut from the budget is not the same as saying that the budget is in great shape.
13 and 14.) Really? I mean, that. Really? Conservatives are the only people who have read the Constitution? You get to claim dibs on the Bible and the Constitution?
15.) Another one we agree on. Except you see yourself as a beacon of freedom, putting your life on the line to defend America. And I see you as a dumbass in a costume who almost blew his balls off.
16.) Only liberals believe the government is the best equipped body to respond to specific problems. Which is why conservatives are clamoring to reduce the military budget.
17.) This doesn’t mean anything.
18.) The president cannot raise taxes. Congress passes a law to increase or decrease tax rates. The president can only sign or veto laws. Obama did not raise your taxes.
19.) Given the way conservatives had their asses handed to them in 2008 and 2012, I hope they can put forth a viable candidate in 3 years. Someone who has responded to the social changes in the US in the past 8 years. Someone who acknowledges that most people view laws against same- sex marriage are discriminatory and illegal. Someone who recognizes that the quickly growing minority population is going to have a profound effect on how the country reforms immigration laws, wage laws, health care benefits and the role of the social safety net over the next decades. Someone who believes that we need to protect ourselves from foreign enemies while simultaneously scaling back a bloated military budget. Someone who wants to find a middle ground between allowing business to grow and flourish while not making that growth at the expense of the average citizen. Someone who knows that 98% of women have used birth control, and we would like to keep the government out of any future decisions on if or when we get pregnant. Fuck man, let’s be honest here. You need a conservative who sounds a lot like Barak Obama.
Lol! It’s hilarious to see how badly some people need to belittle or berate themselves and to what lengths they will go to do so… Like complaining about a map that centers on the host country (usually printed so for the sake of convenience) and how unfair it is to the other side of the world (who don’t use America-centric maps anyway). Or like trying to take it to the other extreme and adopting a map that suggests that Africa is almost as big as Asia and Europe combined (when in fact Eurasia is almost twice the size of Africa) or that South America is larger than North America (tracing paper will prove that for you in virtually no time). If you want accuracy, try a globe. They only cost about $10 at Walmart. If you don’t have a Walmart, try running a search for Goode’s Homolosine projection map. It is considerably more accurate when it comes to sizes than the Gall-Peters projection. And if you would rather forgo accuracy for economy, you could just shut up and use what you are given. Yup, sheep are funny. Especially when they follow blindly in an attempt to be rebellious. LOL!
I posted this in reply on a messageboard: Listen, I hear you all, and I feel for maryam and hope her feelings aren’t badly hurt, but you longtimers know that Russell does not like the over-effusive gushing or to be put on a pedestal. I think he tried to gently tell her that with his first tweet but clearly she didn’t understand it. The second was more direct but he didn’t say “Get a f*cking life” like he has done a couple of times in the past at concerts and his response wasn’t as harsh as he gives to some of the people who troll him. maryam is an innocent, I know, but she still tweets a dozen or so times a day with perhaps sincere but over-effusive praise and love, and it’s love for some fantasy Russell/Maximus, not the real human being we know, the one who can kind and generous but who can also be sharp tongued at times. I’m sorry it was directed at her but at other times he has just blocked people who clog his stream with nothing but I Love You Russells etc., either too much hate or too much ‘love’ can cause a blockage, so to speak, lol. As Fiddle says, and as Russell has said so many times, tweet me something interesting, tweet me something about yourself, he’s interested in talking to people, not hearing nothing but Maximus quotes tweeted to him, or perhaps sincere but OTT praise and adoration. I’ve thought at times of saying something to maryam about ins & outs of Twitter but I didn’t know what to say. There were other people who got a little sharp tongue yesterday, including longtimer and my friend, secretariat, who jumped in early when she thought music was the focus of the convo and didn’t realize that he was going to be ranting on the media. Some lady got blocked when she said something snarky about the phone incident, then seemed surprised. Sure, there was a moment or two when I wanted to tell him to just step away from the computer and take a walk or something but I didn’t. secretariat and I both tweeted him an FYI about a crap site who were obviously following his stream yesterday as they posted a couple of the media rant tweets in less than one hour after he had posted them. I think a lot of people who follow Russell don’t bother to read his tweet stream, I hope you all know you don’t see his whole stream just by reading your own timeline. You don’t see all his tweets unless you click on his name and then click on All. It also appears that there are a good many people who just think they’re having a two way convo with him and don’t read the tone of the convo or don’t care, just blithely step in their with their tweet, be it a good one or a nasty one. One guy who got blocked yesterday stated afterwards he was just joking around and thought he was talking to a ‘bot’ not the real Russell Crowe. So there are innocents, like maryam, there are a lot of great tweeters (luckily the majority) and there are also a lot of assholes who are nasty just for the sake of being nasty. He’s human, like the rest of us, and I’m sure we’ve all said things we wish we hadn’t or been rude to someone at some point, and we don’t have over 750,000 followers streaming both gushing love and hate-filled epithets at us 24/7. He was obviously overtired yesterday and should have stepped away from the computer but he didn’t.
This article did make a very valid point in highlighting the hypocrisy and sense of entitlement that exists among a significant portion of so-called nice guys. That being said, there is a legitimate problem that can arise when two people are in a close relationship, yet with each person having a very different view as to the nature of that relationship. Friendships between men and women (or any friendships with the possibility of sexual attraction) are just damn difficult. I have seen in my own life and among my friends, the problems that can arise when one person develops romantic feelings for another person and those feelings are not shared. In fact, one of the clearest examples was that of a female friend of mine. Over a period of a couple years, she was very close friends with another guy in our social circle. There was a lot of flirting, a lot of time spent together, an uncomfortable amount of playful physical contact with one another, etc - but never anything more. And these were people in their mid-20s. It should have been clear to the guy that my friend was interested in something more (to be fair, she never said anything), but he was happy for the attention and said nothing until she finally pressed the issue. I think this is part of the problem with many genuine nice guys and girls, they are either too shy or don’t have the same emotional intelligence as most people, and when they fall for someone who is either outright manipulative or also lacks emotional intelligence, they are bound for disappointment. The genuine ones might also not rush to ask someone out because they are respecting certain boundaries – e.g. the person is a coworker, they just got out of another relationship, etc. I think our challenge as mature people is to both set appropriate boundaries and to just be honest with people. It is easy to criticize “nice guys” who turn a simple hello into a marriage proposal, but it is much harder to set boundaries with someone who is giving you lots of attention and emotional support. Realize that part of the reason you may really like the person as a friend is because that person is putting way more time and energy into your relationship than any other in their life, all because they see the potential for something special. While you are by no means obligated to sleep with someone who is nice to you, I do believe that when a person willingly accepts another person’s friendship and attention, we do our best to treat them with respect and honesty. Real friendships involve mutual give and take, not out of obligation, but from shared affection. If someone is way more into the friendship (and probably interested in something more), be courageous enough to be honest with them. Or, to put it one way, please have the decency to be the asshole. Letting someone down easily is not a gift, because a broken heart usually screws with a person’s ability understand subtlety. And remember, a lot of genuinely nice people are also emotionally stupid. Is it fair that you have to be the bigger person and have to risk hurting someone’s feelings? Maybe not, but honesty is the price we pay for letting people into our lives. So please, the next time you reject someone, be a jerk about it. From younger me, thanks!
I’m not referring to a general pleasant attitude that is expected with common sense and politeness. I’m referring to strangers who were extremely rude to me expecting me to treat them like family or best friends because I was on the other side of the counter. I’m also referring to what a lot of people in the media, comedians etc have complained about, the baristas being overly nice or far too chit chatty. They MAKE you act like that, because if you don’t smile and make eye contact with every single customer you lose points on your mystery shop. This is almost impossible to do when you have over 50 customers per hour with half a dozen special orders on every drink. You also have to complete each transaction within a very short amount of time. They weigh the drinks and bring in thermometers and they will write very long appraisals of you on everything from the tone of your voice, to your appearance, and sometimes those mystery shoppers can be overly descriptive of what a horrible person you are when your biggest offense was simply missing eye contact when you personally handed someone their drink and remembered to say thank you. It’s enough to make you cry, and all this for minimum wage. It’s really difficult to give that kind of attention to people when you have to keep track of all of this, but all of the types of people listed here still come in everyday expecting to not even have to order their drinks because you should have it memorized, and chat you up when there is a line out the door and a line of cups going all the way across the bar all the way to the pastry case. I had to pretend to be interested in talking to people who were holding me up, and be their best friend, when in reality I had a job to do and needed to get back to doing it. If you want personal interaction with a friend at a coffee shop, meet a friend at a coffee shop, but don’t trap people, (essentially strangers) into getting into a long and detailed conversation with you. They are being nice because they can’t tell you to leave them alone and let them get back to work, if they did they would get fired. So yes, I was paid to be nice to people I did not want to spend more time with than was necessary. Basically a prostitute. If anyone is unsure of whether or not a barista really thinks of them as a friend, (this goes for any type of service person, waitress, cashier, etc) ask yourself if they would hang out with you anywhere else. If the answer is no, you have probably been burdening someone with your cute little opinions and wasting their time. Remember, they can’t ask you nicely to stop talking can they? It’s called putting yourself in someone else’s shoes and trying to be considerate of other people.
This is seriously such a ridiculous statement and the ‘evidence’ in this article is so weak. While “You Belong With Me” and “Better Than Revenge” are two songs with problematic lyrics/music videos when it comes to feminism, she wrote these songs before she turned 21! It’s completely absurd to say that a teenage girl talking smack about a girl who stole her boyfriend makes her “hate all women.” Do you know how many teenagers are in this situation and wish death on the “other woman”? Being angry at a woman for stealing your man does not make you anti-feminist. Let’s look at other ‘woman-bashing’ songs by females. Does Hayley Williams hate all females because in “Misery Business” she sings about another woman stealing her man? This woman “has a body like an hourglass” and is “a whore” according to the lyrics. Much more damning than Taylor’s lyrics. Does Carrie Underwood hate all females because she sings about a “bleached-blond tramp” in “Before He Cheats”? And what about Amy Winehouse, whose man left her and “kept his d*ck wet” in “Back to Black”? (Meaning he left her and had sex… much more explicitly than in Taylor’s “Revenge.”) No one has ever called these women anti-feminist, but somehow Taylor is repeatedly attacked for it. Everyone who attacks Taylor for being anti-feminist is just showing off that they know the finer points of feminism that they learned in college. Taylor is a young woman writing personal songs that very rarely cast other females in a negative light. Is it true that a little feminist education would benefit it? Based on her response to whether or not she’s a feminist, yes. But remember, most people don’t understand what real feminism is and if you poll a hundred random strangers, I guarantee that 90+ will say that it’s about men vs. women. Now you all know that Taylor does not hate every woman and does not believe that women and men should not have equal rights. Get it together.
I’m pretty sure the red bull calendar focuses on all the extreme sport athletes they sponsor which, for an extreme sport enthusiast, would probably be a cool calendar. I mean they sponsored Felix Baumgartner! An image of the guy who jumped from 24 miles above the earth seems like a neat thing to look at for a month. This article is typical of buzzfeed in that the author seems to draw an odd, unfounded, and in all honesty dumb and unfunny conclusions about random topics that only seem to serve the purpose of filling up space on a page so that an advertiser will pay for the space next to it. Buzzfeed is currently the only site I visit regularly that I don’t disable adblock for because It is increasingly apparent that its content is solely dictated by “page-view journalism.” There are stronger examples of this than this specific article (the unfounded, grossly inaccurate attack on The Oatmeal comes to mind) but it’s a trend that’s been bothering me and it seems this is the moment when I’m going to put together a long response. The lack of thought put into this article is…indicative of a real downturn in the quality of buzzfeed lately. I could have just clicked and moved on and you could argue that I’ve wasted my time writing such a long comment but god, I used to really enjoy this site! It had a lot of variety that covered topics I probably wouldn’t have come across in my regular internet browsing and was often written in an entertaining way. But it seems like now it’s rare that I find myself enjoying the sum of the day’s articles, and common that I end up disappointed and baffled that a site chooses to publish such asinine content. I think I just keep reading out of a misguided hope that the lack of quality is just some growing pains or temporary condition and that BF will tighten the ship and return to form. Maybe that same misguided hope is really the reason I wrote this whole thing out, my misguided hope that an editor of the site reads this or has it brought to their attention by a moderator and evaluates the standards of the things they publish and the decisions made about content and quality rather than quantity. Perhaps they could develop a way for users to filter content tailored more towards them and more importantly blocking certain topics/tags. Or alternatively make the tags visible on the main page so that I can avoid clicking through and feeling like I’m contributing to the decline in content by giving them a page-view on an article that wrongly endorses it’s popularity when an editor looks at the statistics on what topics they should continue covering. And if I’m being brutally honest the option to personally tag low quality authors who consistently put out poorly composed articles so I can avoid them after I’ve identified them. Something needs to change, though I fear it won’t and…one day Buzzfeed will just be another site I used to visit daily.
Tim Ralston is building an empire selling the Crovel, a half-shovel, half-weapon for practical-minded doomsday preppers, spinning the American Dream out of our worst nightmares. In the woods and up the creek with the end times’ greatest success story.
Desktop Apps, they stopped making them after Windows 8 did away with the “Start Menu” and replaced it with the “Start Screen” to look more like Apple’s iOS. Apple holds the patent on “desktop apps” even if Xerox invented them first. Apple didn’t invent Desktop Apps, every 8 bit computer has had them even if they were just monochrome text on a green screen, that background was a desktop. It was the Palm Pilot that came up with a mobile device that used icons to display in a start screen. But Windows CE stole that, as did Blackberry, Apple’s iOS, and Android. HP bought out Palm and made PalmOS into WebOS, which is open source now and they can’t even give it away for free. Apple is busy making the AppleTV device, copying every feature that TiVO has and then stealing ideas from NetFlix, Hulu, and Youtube to make their new AppleTV cable/satellite/Internet TV set top box that will revolutionize the TV industry by playing videos in ‘channels’ and allowing you to switch from one channel to another using a ‘remote control’ device. Not only that but they will charge a ‘monthly fee’ for use of the device instead of per video you watch. Two to three times as much as the cable or satellite TV companies charge, even if it is the very same thing, but hey it is Apple, so it must be innovative and worth it.
So let me get Ben’s argument straight here: DC is populated with power-starved, group-thinking, talking-point-regurgitating, yes-men/women bureaucrats. Susan Rice is a classic example of one of these. Therefore Susan Rice deserves promotion. Um, no thanks. Full disclosure: I happily voted for Obama twice. But I also believe Susan Rice deserves to get busted down several pay grades for her colossally dishonest TV performances the Sunday after Benghazi. Let me explain. But first, let’s stipulate that anyone who honestly thinks Republicans are attacking Susan Rice because they’re racists could never be persuaded to vote Republican anyway. Said person likely watches WAY too much MSNBC and is really just DYING for Al Sharpton or worse, Ed Schultz, to throw his hat in the ring. So I see no great risk to the GOP in attacking her because of the, uh, optics, I guess is what you Beltway geniuses call them. But, you also say, the “merits” of the Susan Rice-didn’t-shoot-straight-on-Benghazi argument “are indeed thin.” Really? How’s that exactly? Obama not wanting to admit that al-Qaeda is alive and well and taking out high-ranking Americans overseas seem like a pretty fking strong motive to me. But, Ben, you skate right by that and argue instead that 1) “it’s unclear how such a coverup would endure” 2) Rice wasn’t in a position to mastermind such a coverup and 3) she’s hardly the first to f-up like this. My answers: 1) Such a coverup didn’t have to endure. It just had to endure until the election. 2) Of course she didn’t mastermind it, she just played along with it, wittingly or unwittingly. Either way, that’s the problem. And 3) the fact that “she’s hardly the first” to lie to the American people just doesn’t strike me as a qualification for higher office. The bottom line is: Susan Rice went on TV and gave the American people a bunch a phony excuses about something really terrible that happened. And a lot of people in the White House and the CIA and likely elsewhere knew at the time that they were a bunch of phony excuses. The rest of us only found out later. In an even moderately functional Democracy, Rice’s screwup would bode poorly for her public career. That she might get passed up for promotion may be the only that good thing that comes of all this. Meanwhile, Ben — and the rest of you DC reporters sitting around pounding out this sort of thinly-reported, echo-chamber commentary about how the GOP should quit picking on Rice because she’s black and because everybody spouts lies and BS to get a promotion in DC anyway — why don’t you actually try to figure out who knew what and when about the talking points that have become the downfall of your beloved candidate for Secretary of State. That might actually be interesting reading.
“Buzzfeed is full of a bunch of bandwagon following hypocrites.” I’m sure there are a few of those, yes. There are also longtime professional musicians who are well aware that Bieber is a very minor talent who’s achieved fame and fortune far in excess of what he actually deserves - an assessment that, sad to say, applies to the majority of popular “artists” these days. There are some who are deserving of their success, but not many. Not many at all. I can’t really complain too much about how the music business has treated me. I’ve had my moments in the sun, but I know plenty of people who’ve been honing their craft since long before Bieber was even so much as a twinkle in his daddy’s eye and whose toenail clippings have more talent than he has, yet they can’t get a break and likely never will until and unless the music industry decides to stop catering to kids who wouldn’t know good music if they heard it. Like it or not, they’re entitled to hate him just a little. But then, who am I kidding? Record companies have, of course, always had an eye toward profits - they aren’t in business to lose money, after all - but there was a time when talent counted for something too. You had to have more to bring to the table than just a pretty face to land a contract with a major record label. Those days, unfortunately, are long since over. They won’t stop catering to kids who wouldn’t know good music if they heard it because these days, the popular music industry is in large part *run* by kids who wouldn’t know good music if they heard it. They aren’t looking for the next Chick Corea, Jeff Beck or Jaco Pastorius. They’re looking for the next Justin Bieber. And that’s just fucking sad.
So you’re saying you don’t have healthcare now? If not, who do you think will be paying for it? Hate to break the news, but Obamacare is forcing either your employer or YOU to pay for it! Either way, the money is coming out of YOUR pocket. If you are employed full time, and your employer is forced to buy it for you, where do you think that money will come from?? Hmmm??? Companies (like McDonalds and many others) have already said they will be hiring fewer full time employees, laying people off, and paying the ones they do have less, in order to pay for the expense of having to insure everyone! Bottom line is YOU will be paying for your healthcare one way or another and you won’t have a choice in the matter. If you don’t have it, the government will be fining you! That is called LACK OF FREEDOM by any standard! Honestly, you need to use your brain! Stop listening to the talking heads and do your own research. Read up on this law, and understand what its all about. Open an economics textbook and understand the cause and effect of policies like this on the economy! This law isn’t “free” healthcare, it’s forced healthcare. I don’t even want to go into the massive problems this is going to cause with the level of healthcare we do get. Hope you like the DMV because that’s going to be your healthcare. Inefficiency, poor care, long waits, to a degree you can’t even imagine. Don’t believe me, just go live in England for a while and see how they do it over there. You have to wait months in some cases just to qualify for certain surgeries and that’s only if you get approved! As far as this nonsense about forced pregnancies, you are clearly uninformed again. First off, Romney is a social moderate. He was governor of one of the most liberal states in America. He never ran on a platform of abortion reform. He said he personally didn’t believe in abortion but didn’t have any intention of pushing any sort of anti abortion agenda. Furthermore, even if he did, a president doesn’t have the power to overturn a Supreme Court ruling. Roe V Wade has long been decided and the president can’t do anything about it. He can’t just say, hey supremes lets look at Roe V Wade again. It doesn’t work that way. Again, you need to open a book and read up on how our government branches works. You are being brainwashed by propaganda because you are too lazy to do your own research. There are nut cases on the left and right that make stupid out of touch comments. Unfortunately, Romney got blamed for remarks made by two idiots that frankly don’t deserve to be called republicans. Romney emphatically condemned those remarks, and as a voter it’s your job to separate fact from political fiction. You didn’t do that and now we are all going to pay the price. I could go on and on, and I’m acutely aware that my snarky comments aren’t the best way to persuade anyone. I’m just frustrated that people allow themselves to believe everything they read without verifying facts. Liberalism has been tried in so many countries and it’s led to oppression and misery in every case. I don’t want to live in Cuba where most don’t even have internet access. I don’t want to live in the former USSR, where they had to wait in line just to buy bread! I don’t want to live in Greece where a quarter of the population is unemployed. That’s not freedom for anyone. Make fun and mock conservatives all you want, but we are all in this together. When this country stumbles and falls, we all stumble and fall, left and right alike. America deserves better than Barack Obama.
The truth at the New York Radio City show on Saturday September 30, is that an audience member annoyed John Anthony Gillis and subsequently he could not get past his gargantuan ego. Around the 20 minute mark of a 45 minute show, Jack at the end of consecutive songs, came charging over to stage right and had a hissy fit at a guy in front. For what I didn’t quite hear but it was something like clapping or not clapping or talking during songs and Jack’s professional advice was to tell the guy to follow his instructions for “at least the next three songs”. Now this guy was no match for the the alternative scene chosen one, in fact he looked like a complete dork in a white shirt, sweater vest, light blue jeans and sneakers. After the show (well waiting for it to continue more accurately) all of the ushers and security people who had been backstage or on the radio said that Jack was unhappy with the sound. During the 45 minute show, Jack did not once go over to the sound engineer for the stage mix to complain or adjust anything, nor did he say anything through the PA or talk off stage to the front of house engineer (who by the way did a brilliant mix) about sound quality issues.
The truth is that someone pissed Jack off and then backstage because he realized he could not get out of the massive hole he had dug, threw his engineers under the tour bus to take the fall. Engineers who are probably world class, fiercely loyal and have partners and kids and bills to pay. What kind of a human being gets pissed off with one person and then punishes 6,000 others along with his family, friends and employees that are all close by?
The over arching message here is that Jack’s ego has no room for sincerity, the fans role in his life is to increase the balance in his checking account. Jack will always have beautiful clothes, decor, amps and people around for the rest of his life and doesn’t give a damn about the narcissistic fraud he perpetrated tonight in New York. Jack cant stand loosing, just like a 4 year old can’t. Did you always have to win when you were little Jack? I bet you did and the sad thing is that can’t be fixed in a 37 year old who never matured and will continue to create wreckage, additional divorces, tantrums and so on and so forth.
This buzzfeed post was completely and utterly vapid. I was waiting for THE REST OF THE STORY, like how you ran into Stieg Larsson’s son Gunter and he said he dug your new ‘do, then he asked you to help be the editor for the long lost 4th book his father wrote, but you had to go do all the work in Stockholm and Hamburg for some odd logistical reasons, so off you jetted, and there you ran into a theatrical agent while drinking a Tuborg at an outdoor cafe, and ended up making $200k extra by doing a really awesome international commercial for Fresca. and that money ended-up paying for life-saving surgery for your ex-boyfriend’s granny, that she could never afford and the evil insurance company’s been denying for years, because you realized the night you woke up in the ER after you got paid, partied down, and almost drowned in one of Hamburg’s canals, that no matter how broken, the destitute old lady in all of us is still worth saving, and unlike her, you still have the time left to recover from mistakes and grow your hair back. …
But instead you decided a ventage you should’ve whined about only to your girlfriends was actually a grand, quixotic, narwhal-cock-slugging epic worthy of publication on a high-circulation blog. I’m surprised you didn’t demand a solo episode on Radiolab. Or in summary: what @DrSpaceman said^.
This really is a CANVAS element that requires process heavy javascript to implement and specific standards of the CANVAS element that not all the latest browsers have implemented correctly. This would be a good idea to note in this page, since many people are not tech-savvy enough to decipher what an element requires to work. These same issues occurred and still occurs with companies making the transition from Flash to jQuery or HTML5 elements; They’re told by random site something is possible when it is not.
