This is a man who openly advocates genocide, brazenly endeavors to commit terrorist attacks on American soil, kills and kidnaps Americans abroad, brutalizes his own people, sponsors terrorism around the world, and is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear bomb.
Today, on 9/11, we need to ask why. Why is he being given this global megaphone?
In September of 2010 Ahmadinejad used the podium of the United Nations General Assembly to make this claim about the 9/11 terror attacks: “Some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy…”
In September of 2011 he complained that “Colonial powers … threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust.”
It is a moral outrage that the Obama administration is facilitating Ahmadinejad’s return to the United States in September of 2012.
Many argue that the 1947 Headquarters Agreement between the UN and the U.S. leaves no room for the White House to maneuver on this point. The deal that was struck states that the U.S. government “shall not impose any impediments to transit to or from the headquarters district” (a defined area in New York City’s east side) to a representative of a UN member state.
But the same agreement also says the following: “It is agreed that no form of racial or religious discrimination shall be permitted within the headquarters district.”
Ahmadinejad is the quintessential bigot. In 2008, he told the General Assembly “a small but deceitful number of people called Zionists … have been dominating an important portion of the financial and monetary centers as well as the political decision-making centers of some Europeans countries and the US in a deceitful, complex and furtive manner.” If the agreement were applied as it should be, “no form of racial or religious discrimination” would mean no President Ahmadinejad in New York.
In 1988 Yassir Arafat, then Head of the Palestine Liberation Organization was denied a visa and unimpeded transit when he tried to address the General Assembly, despite the objections of UN legal counsel. The State Department pointed to the “security reservation” that Congress had attached to the resolution which brought the Headquarters Agreement into force. Congress had stipulated that nothing in the agreement diminished or weakened “the right of the United States to safeguard its own security…”
Read the full article here: