Is he wrong? Does Evan McMorris-Santoro (a former hack for the partisan TPM) have a study showing the opposite? Or, doesn’t that matter since his claims stand in the way of big banks and big business making huge profits from increased immig.?

It should be abundantly obvious that he and his brother did it by now. On another note, it’s worth bearing in mind that there will be some number of people just like him and his brother in the group that MarcoRubio and BarackObama want to legalize with their amnesty. And, some of those that MarcoRubio and BarackObama want to legalize might do things a lot more damaging to the U.S. than this bombing.

Let’s try that link again: 24ahead.com/cir2013s Please choose one of those pages at random and do the job Andrew Kaczynski won’t do.

I partially agree with Andrew Kaczynski about something, who-hoo! The question becomes, when will Andrew Kaczynski discuss all the things about the bill or “reform” in general that would harm the U.S. and that are far more important than “MarcoPhones”? One major purpose of the bill is to scr*w American workers into the ground (and most of them are Democrats, not GOP fatcats). When can we expect Andrew Kaczynski to discuss that? P.S. In case anyone else wans to help discredit the Senate bill, here are each of its sections on individual pages. Please choose a section at random and leave a (disqus) comment showing how that section would fail. We have to do the job the MSM won’t do.

What BS describes as “trolls” aren’t trolls at all. And, believe me, I’ve trolled people from USENET to the web. The bad kind of trolls are those who just say things to get a rise out of people; the good kind (like when I’ve done it) are engaging in satire designed to make a point; those BS is referring to are just people he disagrees with or finds a bit “farouche”. Another possibility is that BS is referring to those who’ve caught him in lies, like me:   In case any “trolls” are reading this, link to that page to help BS get famous beyond BuzzFeed.

There appear to have been at least two Buzzfeed reporters at the event, and that’s it? Why not ask him if he thinks it’s good policy? As it is, it looks like he thinks it’s good policy, he’s just playing politics. P.S. What O did is not in any way good policy:  

drivebyfruiting opines: “The really sad thing is that this is the stuff we as a country decide to focus on…” I’ve posted over a dozen posts showing how BuzzfeedBen lies and misleads, plus several dozen comments at his old site doing the same. I’ve also attempted to contact other BF writers on Twitter. Discrediting them sends a message to their bosses and if enough people joined in would force coverage about real issues.

Their list of those in “Breitbartworld” includes Niccolo Machiavelli, who apparently Rosie Gray couldn’t reach for comment. In addition to things like that, they’re also doing the list all wrong. Anywho, those involved in this seem to also be supporters of the person many r/w bloggers were blogging about yesterday. They appear to be extremists not in the ideological sense, but in their tactics. It’s hard to tell which group is, all things considered, worse.

href links are messed up here, so see this for the group that Rosie Gray thinks is a credible source:  

1. The SPLC isn’t a credible group, see the link. 2. The “liberal blog” is actually run by another non-credible group: 24ahead.com/pfaw 3. The site behind that “liberal blog” joined a group whose members include the Wobblies, ANSWER, and others of that ilk. The latter group is a front for a Stalinist party. I’ll wait right here while Rosie Gray asks them about their buddies.

What JPMoore mocks is a years-old, *demonstrated* concept: 100,000s of people have already done it (such as due to the economic downturn). If you haven’t heard the phrase before, it’s because the MSM has worked to keep the concept hidden from you. Don’t be a useful idiot for those who want to keep whole concepts from you.